11.7
46.9 %
73 %
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is poor, 46.9%.
Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.
The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Publication data is available only after login.
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 2.9 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 5.3 | 4.4 | 23.2 | 94.9% | 1.0 |
| Article, other | 0.5 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.3 | 0.8 | 40.0% | 0.4 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 3.8 | 2.2 | 7.0 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 6.4 | 5.6 | 28.5 | 7.9% | 0.5 |
| Conference paper, other | NA | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.4 | NA | 2.0 | NA | 4.6 | 4.3% | 0.1 |
| Proceeding (editor) | NA | 0.3 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.3 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Report | 0.7 | NA | 0.8 | NA | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | NA | 2.0 | NA | NA | 1.0 | NA | 3.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Licentiate thesis | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 10 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 13 | 60 | 95.0% | 1 |
| Article, other | 1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 8 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 10 | 60 | 10.0% | 1 |
| Conference paper, other | NA | 2 | 3 | 2 | NA | 2 | NA | 9 | 11.1% | 0 |
| Proceeding (editor) | NA | 1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Report | 2 | NA | 2 | NA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | NA | 2 | NA | NA | 1 | NA | 3 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Licentiate thesis | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 2.7 | 14.8 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.3 | 21.6 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2016 | 1.9 | 8.6 | 4.5 | 0.3 | 17.5% |
| 2017 | 2.5 | 12.1 | 4.9 | 0.2 | 6.7% |
| 2018 | 2.8 | 9.5 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| Total | 13.2 | 66.6 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 3.8% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average Cf | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 7.1 | 1.06 | 0.2 | 3.5% |
| 2015-2017 | 6.5 | 0.99 | 0.2 | 3.8% |
| 2016-2018 | 6.8 | 0.61 | 0.1 | 1.1% |
| 2017-2019 | 10.3 | 0.60 | 0.2 | 2.4% |
| Total | 17.4 | 0.79 | 0.5 | 2.8% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 6 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 21.3%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 18 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 93.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average Journal Cf | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 7.1 | 1.30 | 2.6 | 36.4% |
| 2015-2017 | 6.5 | 1.12 | 1.6 | 24.2% |
| 2016-2018 | 6.8 | 1.08 | 1.6 | 22.9% |
| 2017-2019 | 10.3 | 1.19 | 3.3 | 31.9% |
| 2018-2020 | 12.3 | 1.26 | 4.6 | 37.3% |
| Total | 21.5 | 1.24 | 7.5 | 34.9% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 18 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 93.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Swedish non-university co-publications | Share Swedish non-university | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 21 | 2 | 9.5% | 9 | 42.9% |
| 2015-2017 | 18 | 4 | 22.2% | 10 | 55.6% |
| 2016-2018 | 18 | 9 | 50.0% | 10 | 55.6% |
| 2017-2019 | 22 | 13 | 59.1% | 12 | 54.5% |
| 2018-2020 | 29 | 12 | 41.4% | 19 | 65.5% |
| Total | 56 | 17 | 30.4% | 32 | 57.1% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 18 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 92%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.0 |
| United States | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.4 |
| Denmark | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 |
| Canada | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Turkey | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Finland | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Norway | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Lithuania | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Organization | Organization type | Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uponor AB | Company | Sweden | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.3 |
| Bravida Holding AB | Company | Sweden | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.8 |
| Aalborg University | University | Denmark | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 |
| University of California, Berkeley | University | United States | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 |
| Zhejiang University | University | China | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| Dalian University of Technology | University | China | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 |
| Lawrence Berkeley National Lab | Institute | United States | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| Tianjin University | University | China | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| University of Alberta | University | Canada | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Chinese University of Hong Kong | University | China | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBITAK) | Other Public | Turkey | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Karolinska Institutet | University | Sweden | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Aalto University | University | Finland | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Shanghai Jiao Tong University | University | China | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Hong Kong Polytechnic University | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) | Other Public | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| University of Tromsø | University | Norway | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Purdue University | University | United States | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Gävle University College | University College | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden | Institute | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Skanska AB | Company | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Shiraz University | University | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS) | University | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Univ Appl Sci Bldg Energy Technol | University | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Colorado Boulder | University | United States | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Avidicare AB | Company | Sweden | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Hong Kong | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| China Jiliang University | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Guilin University of Electronic Technology (GUET) | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Technical University of Denmark (DTU) | University | Denmark | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Vattenfall | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) | University | Lithuania | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Akademiska Hus | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Catholic University of Leuven | University | Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Eindhoven University of Technology | University | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Swedish Environmental Research Institute | Institute | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Tyrens AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Reading | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Cent South Univ | NA | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Yunnan Electric Power Test & Research Institute Group Co., Ltd. | Company | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Sun Yat-sen University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Tsinghua University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Aarhus University | University | Denmark | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Lund University | University | Sweden | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Gothenburg | University | Sweden | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Open Access publications | OA gold | OA hybrid | OA green | OA bronze | Not OA | Share OA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 20.0% |
| 2015 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 2016 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 33.3% |
| 2019 | 19 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 57.9% |
| 2020 | 19 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 63.2% |
| Total | 76 | 32 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 44 | 42.1% |
The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.
In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:
Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.
Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.
Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.
Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.
N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 3.9 | 56.9 | 14.5 | 1.0 | 25.4% |
| 2015 | 4.8 | 80.4 | 16.9 | 0.8 | 15.8% |
| 2016 | 1.9 | 25.1 | 13.2 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.8 | 23.5 | 8.3 | 0.3 | 11.8% |
| 2018 | 3.8 | 15.9 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 25.3% |
| 2019 | 11.7 | 30.7 | 2.6 | 4.4 | 37.6% |
| 2020 | 9.7 | 13.8 | 1.4 | 6.3 | 65.0% |
| Total | 38.6 | 246.4 | 6.4 | 13.8 | 35.6% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average FWCI | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 10.6 | 1.08 | 0.8 | 7.9% |
| 2015-2017 | 9.5 | 1.13 | 0.4 | 4.8% |
| 2016-2018 | 8.5 | 0.72 | 0.3 | 3.3% |
| 2017-2019 | 17.6 | 0.71 | 0.5 | 3.0% |
| Total | 28.2 | 0.85 | 1.4 | 4.8% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 23 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 47.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average SNIP | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 8.2 | 1.77 | 6.1 | 74.1% |
| 2015-2017 | 7.7 | 1.52 | 5.1 | 65.7% |
| 2016-2018 | 7.2 | 1.54 | 4.4 | 60.8% |
| 2017-2019 | 14.7 | 1.45 | 8.2 | 55.6% |
| 2018-2020 | 19.3 | 1.47 | 10.4 | 53.9% |
| Total | 29.9 | 1.54 | 17.6 | 59.0% |
| Publication years | Publications | Corporate co-publications | Share corporate | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 30 | 1 | 3.3% | 11 | 36.7% |
| 2015-2017 | 27 | 3 | 11.1% | 14 | 51.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 24 | 3 | 12.5% | 15 | 62.5% |
| 2017-2019 | 41 | 2 | 4.9% | 26 | 63.4% |
| 2018-2020 | 55 | 0 | 0.0% | 35 | 63.6% |
| Total | 94 | 3 | 3.2% | 53 | 56.4% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 24 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 54.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
